Table 5

Likelihood of Mono- versus Polydrug Abuse by Demographic Variables and Study Years (N = 69,891)


Total Users
Monodrug Users
Polydrug Users



N = 69,891
n = 35,875 (51.3%)
n = 34,016 (48.7%)
Odds Ratio





Variable
N
%
n
%
n
%
ORa
95% CI

Gender








     Male
48,168
68.9
24,646
51.2
23,522
48.8
0.979c
0.948–1.011
     Female
21,723
31.1
11,229
51.7
10,494
48.3
1.021c
0.989–1.055
Ethnicity








     Caucasian
46,910
69.2
26,218
55.9
20,692
44.1
1.957b
1.893–2.023
     African American
20,393
30.1
7,941
38.9
12,452
61.1
0.504b
0.487–0.521
     Other
495
0.7
269
54.3
226
45.7
1.154ns
0.967–1.379
Age








     <18
6,955
10.0
4,525
65.1
2,430
34.9
1.876b
1.782–1.976
     18–24
10,701
15.3
5,111
47.8
5,590
52.2
0.845b
0.811–0.880
     25–34
20,671
29.6
9,347
45.2
11,324
54.8
0.706b
0.683–0.730
     35–44
21,893
31.3
10,833
49.5
11,060
50.5
0.898b
0.870–0.927
     45–54
8,266
11.8
4,931
59.7
3,335
40.3
1.466b
1.399–1.536
     ≥ 55
1,404
2.0
1,127
80.3
277
19.7
3.950b
3.461–4.509
Residential Area








     Urban
35,062
50.2
17,035
48.6
18,027
51.4
0.802b
0.779–0.826
     Rural
34,829
49.8
18,840
54.1
15,989
45.9
1.248b
1.210–1.285
Year








     1998
9,911
14.2
4,645
46.9
5,266
53.1
0.812b
0.778–0.847
     1999
9,123
13.1
4,327
47.4
4,796
52.6
0.836b
0.800–0.873
     2000
9,598
13.7
5,293
55.1
4,305
44.9
1.194b
1.144–1.247
     2001
10,214
14.6
5,618
55.0
4,596
45.0
1.189b
1.139–1.240
     2002
9,891
14.2
4,885
49.4
5,006
50.6
0.913b
0.875–0.953
     2003
10,738
15.4
5,711
53.2
5,027
46.8
1.092b
1.048–1.138
     2004
10,416
14.9
5,396
51.8
5,020
48.2
1.023ns
0.981–1.066

aOdds ratio of being a mono- versus a polydrug user in comparing a specific level of client demographics to all other demographic features. Odds in this table are calculated for the odds of being a mono vs. polydrug abuser, not for being male rather than female.

bp < 0.0001.

cp < 0.10.

nsNot significant.

Kedia et al. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2007 2:33   doi:10.1186/1747-597X-2-33

Open Data