Table 2 |
||||
|
Logistic regressions predicting binge (n = 647) versus non-binge (n = 6295) drinker status from sociodemographics |
||||
| Binge drinker |
||||
|
|
||||
| Sociodemographics |
B |
OR |
95% CI |
p |
|
|
||||
| Age (mean, SD) |
-.477 |
.621 |
.58–.66 |
<.001 |
| Minority racial/ethnic group member |
.084 |
1.087 |
.93–1.28 |
.311 |
| Not married |
.980 |
2.664 |
2.25–3.16 |
<.001 |
| No children in household |
.135 |
1.144 |
.97–1.35 |
.104 |
| No education beyond high school |
.017 |
1.018 |
.86–1.20 |
.838 |
| Not employed |
.429 |
1.535 |
1.30–1.82 |
<.001 |
| Income below federal poverty line |
.180 |
1.197 |
.98–1.46 |
.081 |
|
|
||||
|
Note: Each p-value is from a Wald X2 (df = 1). |
||||
|
Timko et al. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2008 3:15 doi:10.1186/1747-597X-3-15 |
||||
