Table 2 |
|||
|
Mean PE-IAT effects of those who favour legalising doping and those who oppose; and those who would use doping |
|||
|
Level of agreement |
PE-IAT effect |
PEAS |
|
|
|
|||
|
Legalising doping for TOP athletes |
absolutely not |
-306.09 ± 229.00 |
36.98 ± 10.51 |
|
yes with restrictions |
-294.53 ± 289.30 |
48.50 ± 9.81 |
|
|
yes without restrictions |
-14.50* |
45.00* |
|
|
Legalising doping for ALL athletes |
absolutely not |
-302.36 ± 227.67 |
35.27 ± 8.49 |
|
yes with restrictions |
-270.76 ± 282.67 |
54.50 ± 12.56 |
|
|
yes without restrictions |
- |
45.00 ± 1.41 |
|
|
Hypothetical use of doping (5-DST) |
0 |
-316.45 ± 258.40 |
35.74 ± 8.72 |
|
1 |
- |
42.00* |
|
|
2 |
-206.60 ± 185.43 |
55.71 ± 10.81 |
|
|
3 |
13.667 ± 61.64 |
67.50 ± 13.44 |
|
|
|
|||
|
PE-IAT = Doping Implicit Association Test, PEAS = Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale, 5-DST – 5 Doping Scenarios Test. Level of agreement for 5-DST: number indicates the number of the five scenarios in which the respondent would consider using doping. * n = 1 |
|||
|
Petróczi et al. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2008 3:9 doi:10.1186/1747-597X-3-9 |
|||
