<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</description>
        <dc:date>2013-05-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/7" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/16">
        <title>The housing first model (HFM) fidelity index: designing and testing a tool for measuring integrity of housing programs that serve active substance users</title>
        <description>Background:
The Housing First Model (HFM) is an approach to serving formerly homeless individuals with dually diagnosed mental health and substance use disorders regardless of their choice to use substances or engage in other risky behaviors. The model has been widely diffused across the United States since 2000 as a result of positive findings related to consumer outcomes. However, a lack of clear fidelity guidelines has resulted in inconsistent implementation. The research team and their community partner collaborated to develop a HFM Fidelity Index. We describe the instrument development process and present results from its initial testing.
Methods:
The HFM Fidelity Index was developed in two stages: (1) a qualitative case study of four HFM organizations and (2) interviews with 14 HFM &quot;users&quot;. Reliability and validity of the index were then tested through phone interviews with staff members of permanent housing programs. The final sample consisted of 51 programs (39 Housing First and 12 abstinence-based) across 35 states.
Results:
The results provided evidence for the overall reliability and validity of the index.
Conclusions:
The results demonstrate the index&#8217;s ability to discriminate between housing programs that employ different service approaches. Regarding practice, the index offers a guide for organizations seeking to implement the HFM.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Dennis Watson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Orwat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dana Wagner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Valery Shuman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Randi Tolliver</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2013, null:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-8-16</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-8-16-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/15">
        <title>An exploratory cluster randomised trial of a university halls of residence based social norms marketing campaign to reduce alcohol consumption among 1st year students</title>
        <description>AimsThis exploratory trial examines the feasibility of implementing a social norms marketing campaign to reduce student drinking in universities in Wales, and evaluating it using cluster randomised trial methodology.
Methods:
Fifty residence halls in 4 universities in Wales were randomly assigned to intervention or control arms. Web and paper surveys were distributed to students within these halls (n&#8201;=&#8201;3800), assessing exposure/contamination, recall of and evaluative responses to intervention messages, perceived drinking norms and personal drinking behaviour. Measures included the Drinking Norms Rating Form, the Daily Drinking Questionnaire and AUDIT-C.
Results:
A response rate of 15% (n&#8201;=&#8201;554) was achieved, varying substantially between sites. Intervention posters were seen by 80% and 43% of students in intervention and control halls respectively, with most remaining materials seen by a minority in both groups. Intervention messages were rated as credible and relevant by little more than half of students, though fewer felt they would influence their behaviour, with lighter drinkers more likely to perceive messages as credible. No differences in perceived norms were observed between intervention and control groups. Students reporting having seen intervention materials reported lower descriptive and injunctive norms than those who did not.
Conclusions:
Attention is needed to enhancing exposure, credibility and perceived relevance of intervention messages, particularly among heavier drinkers, before definitive evaluation can be recommended. A definitive evaluation would need to consider how it would achieve sufficient response rates, whilst hall-level cluster randomisation appears subject to a significant degree of contamination.Trial registrationISRCTN: ISRCTN48556384</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Graham Moore</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Annie Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laurence Moore</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Simon Murphy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2013, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-8-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-8-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/14">
        <title>Dropout among patients in qualified alcohol detoxification treatment: the effect of treatment motivation is moderated by Trauma Load</title>
        <description>Background:
Motivation to change has been proposed as a prerequisite for behavioral change, although empirical results are contradictory. Traumatic experiences are frequently found amongst patients in alcohol treatment, but this has not been systematically studied in terms of effects on treatment outcomes. This study aimed to clarify whether individual Trauma Load explains some of the inconsistencies between motivation to change and behavioral change.
Methods:
Over the course of two months in 2009, 55 patients admitted to an alcohol detoxification unit of a psychiatric hospital were enrolled in this study. At treatment entry, we assessed lifetime Trauma Load and motivation to change. Mode of discharge was taken from patient files following therapy. We tested whether Trauma Load moderates the effect of motivation to change on dropout from alcohol detoxification using multivariate methods.
Results:
55.4% dropped out of detoxification treatment, while 44.6% completed the treatment. Age, gender and days in treatment did not differ between completers and dropouts. Patients who dropped out reported more traumatic event types on average than completers. Treatment completers had higher scores in the URICA subscale Maintenance. Multivariate methods confirmed the moderator effect of Trauma Load: among participants with high Trauma Load, treatment completion was related to higher Maintenance scores at treatment entry; this was not true among patients with low Trauma Load.
Conclusions:
We found evidence that the effect of motivation to change on detoxification treatment completion is moderated by Trauma Load: among patients with low Trauma Load, motivation to change is not relevant for treatment completion; among highly burdened patients, however, who a priori have a greater risk of dropping out, a high motivation to change might make the difference. This finding justifies targeted and specific interventions for highly burdened alcohol patients to increase their motivation to change.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Michael Odenwald</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Semrau</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2013, null:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-03-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-8-14</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-8-14-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-03-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/13">
        <title>The index of tobacco treatment quality: development of a tool to assess evidence-based treatment in a national sample of drug treatment facilities</title>
        <description>Background:
Quitting smoking improves health and drug use outcomes among people in treatment for substance abuse. The twofold purpose of this study is to describe tobacco treatment provision across a representative sample of U.S. facilities and to use these data to develop the brief Index of Tobacco Treatment Quality (ITTQ).
Methods:
We constructed survey items based on current tobacco treatment guidelines, existing surveys, expert input, and qualitative research. We administered the survey to a stratified sample of 405 facility administrators selected from all 3,800 U.S. adult outpatient facilities listed in the SAMHSA Inventory of Substance Abuse Treatment Services. We constructed the ITTQ with a subset of 7 items that have the strongest clinical evidence for smoking cessation.
Results:
Most facilities (87.7%) reported that a majority of their clients were asked if they smoke cigarettes. Nearly half of facilities (48.6%) reported that a majority of their smoking clients were advised to quit. Fewer (23.3%) reported that a majority of their smoking clients received tobacco treatment counseling and even fewer facilities (18.3%) reported a majority of their smoking clients were advised to use quit smoking medications. The median facility ITTQ score was 2.57 (on a scale of 1--5) and the ITTQ displayed good internal consistency (Cronbach&apos;s alpha = .844). Moreover, the ITTQ had substantial test-retest reliability (.856), and ordinal confirmatory factor analysis found that our one-factor model for ITTQ fit the data very well with a CFI of 0.997 and an RMSEA of 0.042.
Conclusions:
The ITTQ is a brief and reliable tool for measuring tobacco treatment quality in substance abuse treatment facilities. Given the clear-cut room for improvement in tobacco treatment, the ITTQ could be an important tool for quality improvement by identifying service levels, facilitating goal setting, and measuring change.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>A Cupertino</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jamie Hunt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Byron Gajewski</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yu Jiang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Janet Marquis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Friedmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kimberly Engelman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kimber Richter</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2013, null:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-03-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-8-13</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-8-13-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-03-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/12">
        <title>Factors associated with self-assessed increase in tobacco consumption among over-indebted individuals in Germany: a cross-sectional study</title>
        <description>Background:
Over-indebtedness is an increasing phenomenon in industrialised nations causing individual hardship and societal problems. Nonetheless, few studies have explored smoking among over-indebted individuals.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey (n=949) on retrospectively assessed changes in tobacco consumption was carried out in 2006 and 2007 among clients of 84 officially approved debt and insolvency counselling centres in Germany (response rate 39.7%). Logistic regressions were performed to explore factors associated with reports of increased smoking after onset of over-indebtedness.
Results:
63% of all respondents stated daily or occasional tobacco consumption. Almost one fifth reported an increase in smoking after becoming over-indebted. Females were less likely to report increased smoking than men (aOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.99) whereas respondents who had been over-indebted for more than 10 years were more likely to report increased smoking than those who had been over-indebted for less than five years (aOR 1.66; 95%-CI 1.00-2.76). The odds of increased smoking were also elevated among those who reported that their families and friends had withdrawn from them as a consequence of their over-indebtedness (aOR 1.82; 95%-CI 1.06-3.14).
Conclusions:
The study identifies over-indebted individuals and particularly over-indebted men as a high-risk group of smokers. Low levels of social embeddedness/support were associated with a further increase in smoking after becoming over-indebted. Given recent increases of over-indebtedness, the findings highlight the need to develop appropriate public health policies.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Heiko Rueger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heide Weishaar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elke Ochsmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephan Letzel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eva Muenster</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2013, null:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-03-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-8-12</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-8-12-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-03-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/11">
        <title>Factors associated with implementation of a multicomponent responsible beverage service program &#191; results from two surveys in 290 Swedish municipalities</title>
        <description>Background:
The purpose of this study was to investigate which factors affected the implementation of a multicomponent Responsible Beverage Service (RBS) program in 290 Swedish municipalities and whether the amount of such factors influenced the level of implementation of the program.
Methods:
This study used variation in the presence of implementation-promoting factors to predict the level of implementation of the RBS program in municipalities throughout Sweden. The presence of such factors and the level of implementation of the program were studied by means of two surveys in all Swedish municipalities (N=290). Logistic regression and Spearman&#8217;s correlation analyses were used to analyze the relationship between implementation-promoting factors and the level of implementation of the RBS program.
Results:
The response rates of the two surveys were 96% and 98%, respectively. One main finding was that program fidelity was low. Only 13% of the municipalities surveyed had implemented the RBS program as a whole, as stated in the specification of requirements. In municipalities reporting a higher amount of implementation-promoting factors, a significantly higher level of implementation of the program was shown. Evaluation and feedback was the only factor that correlated significantly with the level of implementation of the RBS program as a whole.
Conclusion:
Evaluation and feedback constitutes an important implementation-promoting factor also in complex programs like the RBS program. Program fidelity is significant for the outcome of an intervention and must be a major focus of the implementation processes.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Björn Trolldal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ulrika Haggård</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karin Guldbrandsson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2013, null:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-03-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-8-11</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-8-11-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-03-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/10">
        <title>Non-response bias and hazardous alcohol use in relation to previous alcohol-related hospitalization: comparing survey responses with population data</title>
        <description>Background:
This study examines whether alcohol-related hospitalization predicts survey non-response, and evaluates whether this missing data result in biased estimates of the prevalence of hazardous alcohol use and abstinence.
Methods:
Registry data on alcohol-related hospitalizations during the preceding ten years were linked to two representative surveys. Population data corresponding to the surveys were derived from the Stockholm County registry. The alcohol-related hospitalization rates for survey responders were compared with the population data, and corresponding rates for non-responders were based on the differences between the two estimates. The proportions with hazardous alcohol use and abstinence were calculated separately for previously hospitalized and non-hospitalized responders, and non-responders were assumed to be similar to responders in this respect.
Results:
Persons with previous alcohol-related admissions were more likely currently to abstain from alcohol (RR=1.58, p&lt;.001) or to have hazardous alcohol use (RR=2.06, p&lt;.001). Alternatively, they were more than twice as likely to have become non-responders. Adjusting for this skewed non-response, i.e., the underrepresentation of hazardous users and abstainers among the hospitalized, made little difference to the estimated rates of hazardous use and abstinence in total. During the ten-year period 1.7% of the population were hospitalized.
Conclusions:
Few people receive alcohol-related hospital care and it remains unclear whether this group&#8217;s underrepresentation in surveys is generalizable to other groups, such as hazardous users. While people with severe alcohol problems &#8211; i.e. a history of alcohol-related hospitalizations &#8211; are less likely to respond to population surveys, this particular bias is not likely to alter prevalence estimates of hazardous use.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Kozma Ahacic</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ingemar Kåreholt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Asgeir Helgason</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Allebeck</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2013, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-03-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-8-10</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-8-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-03-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/9">
        <title>Impact of system-level changes and training on alcohol screening and brief intervention in a family medicine residency clinic: a pilot study</title>
        <description>Background:
Although screening and brief intervention (SBI) are effective in reducing unhealthy alcohol use, major challenges exist in implementing clinician-delivered SBI in primary care settings. This 2006&#8211;2007 pilot study describes the impact of systems changes and booster trainings designed to increase SBI rates in a family medicine residency clinic which annually screened adults with a self-administered AUDIT-C questionnaire and used paper prompts to encourage physician interventions for patients with positive screens.
Methods:
Investigators added the Single Alcohol Screening Question (SASQ) to nursing vital signs forms, added a checkbox for documenting brief interventions to the clinicians&#8217; outpatient encounter form, and conducted one-hour nurse and clinician booster trainings. Impact was measured using chart reviews conducted before implementing systems changes, then six weeks and six months post-implementation.
Results:
At all three time points screening rates using AUDIT-C plus SASQ exceeded 90%, however AUDIT-C screening decreased to 85% after 6&#160;months (p=.025). Identification of unhealthy alcohol users increased from 4% to 22.9% at six weeks and 18.8% at six months (p=.002) using both screens. Nursing vital signs screening using the SASQ reached 71.4% six weeks after implementation but decreased to 45.5% at six months. Changes in clinician brief intervention rates did not achieve statistical significance.
Conclusions:
This is the second study reporting sustained primary care alcohol screening rates of more than 90%. Screening patients with SASQ and/or AUDIT-C identified a higher percentage of patients with unhealthy alcohol use. Dissemination of effective strategies for identifying unhealthy alcohol users should continue, while future research should focus on identifying more effective strategies for increasing intervention rates.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>J Johnson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>J Seale</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sylvia Shellenberger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maribeth Hamrick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Lott</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2013, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-02-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-8-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-8-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-02-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/8">
        <title>Four-year prospective evaluation of the relationship between meaning in life and smoking status</title>
        <description>Background:
To date, all investigations on the relationship between smoking and perceived level of meaning in life have used cross-sectional designs. Therefore, the purpose of the present prospective study, conducted with a four-year time lag, was to test the predictive power of the life meaning construct concerning changes in smoking status.
Methods:
The data of 4,294 respondents (40.3% male, Mage&#8201;=&#8201;54.7&#8201;&#177;&#8201;16.5&#8201;yrs) from the Hungarian Epidemiological Panel Survey were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann&#8211;Whitney U-test and structural equation modeling (SEM) with a nominal outcome variable. Gender, age, and educational level were included in the study as covariates.
Results:
On the bivariate level, results showed that both baseline and follow-up meaning in life scores were higher in stable non-smokers when compared to stable smokers. However, quitters and starters differed from stable non-smokers in their baseline but not in follow-up life meaning scores. The other relationships (stable smokers vs. quitters; stable smokers vs. starters, starters vs. quitters) were non-significant in both time points. According to the SEM-analysis, a higher sense of meaning in life measured at baseline and follow-up is associated with a lower likelihood (OR&#8201;=&#8201;0.54, z&#8201;=&#8201;2.80, p&#8201;=&#8201;0.005; OR&#8201;=&#8201;0.64, z&#8201;=&#8201;2.88, p&#8201;=&#8201;0.004, respectively) of being a stable smoker compared to being a stable non-smoker, confirming the expected relationship between smoking and decreased level of meaning in life. However, neither baseline nor follow-up life meaning scores predicted significantly quitting and uptake of smoking.
Conclusions:
If future research from other cultures verifies the protective role of a higher level of meaning in life against smoking, then smoking prevention and cessation programs will also have to include such components that help individuals experience more meaning in their lives.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Barna Konkolÿ Thege</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Róbert Urbán</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mária Kopp</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2013, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-02-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-8-8</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-8-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-02-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/7">
        <title>Reductions in non-medical prescription opioid use among adults in Ontario, Canada: are recent policy interventions working?</title>
        <description>Background:
Non-medical prescription opioid use (NMPOU) and prescription opioid (PO) related harms have become major substance use and public health problems in North America, the region with the world&#8217;s highest PO use levels. In Ontario, Canada&#8217;s most populous province, NMPOU rates, PO-related treatment admissions and accidental mortality have risen sharply in recent years. A series of recent policy interventions from governmental and non-governmental entities to stem PO-related problems have been implemented since 2010.FindingsWe compared the prevalence of NMPOU in the Ontario general adult population (18 years+) in 2010 and 2011 based on data from the &#8216;Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Monitor&#8217; (CM), a long-standing annual telephone interview-based representative population survey of substance use and health indicators. While &#8216;any PO use&#8217; (in past year) changed non-significantly from 26.6% to 23.9% (Chi2 =&#8201;2.511; df&#8201;=&#8201;1; p&#8201;=&#8201;&#8201;0.113), NMPOU decreased significantly from 7.7% to 4.0% (Chi2 =&#8201;14.786; df&#8201;=&#8201;1; p&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.001) between 2010 and 2011. Over-time changes varied by age group but not by sex.
Conclusions:
The observed substantial decrease in NMPOU in the Ontario adult population could be related to recent policy interventions, alongside extensive media reporting, focusing on NMPOU and PO-related harms, and may mean that these interventions have shown initial effects. However, other casual factors could have been involved. Thus, it is necessary to systematically examine whether the observed changes will be sustained, and whether other key PO-related harm indicators (e.g., treatment admissions, accidental mortality) change correspondingly in order to more systematically assess the impact of the policy measures.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Benedikt Fischer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anca Ialomiteanu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Kurdyak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Mann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jürgen Rehm</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2013, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-02-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-8-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-8-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-02-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
