<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</description>
        <dc:date>2012-01-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/34" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/33" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/32" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/31" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/30" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/5">
        <title>Why should I comply? Sellers&apos; accounts for (non-)compliance with legal age limits for alcohol sales.
</title>
        <description>Background:
Availability is an important predictor of early and excessive alcohol consumption by adolescents. Many countries have implemented age limits to prevent underage purchases of alcohol. However, shop-floor compliance with these age limits appears to be problematic. This study addresses the issue of non-compliance with age limits. Which measures do vendors take to avoid underage alcohol sales, and what do they report as important reasons to comply or not with age limits for alcohol sales?
Methods:
Open-ended telephone interviews were conducted with store managers selling alcohol (N=106). Prior to the interviews, all outlets were visited by an underage mystery shopper in order to measure compliance with the legal age limits on alcohol sales. The interview results are compared against actual compliance rates.
Results:
Several measures have been taken to prevent underage sales, but the compliance level is low. Furthermore, open coding resulted in 19 themes, representing both valid and invalid arguments, that vendors mentioned as relevant to their decisions of whether to comply with the law. Compliance with age limits is dependent on the knowledge of the rules and the ability and motivation to follow the rules. The ability aspect in particular seems to be problematic, but in many cases, the motivation to actively comply with the age limits is lacking.
Conclusions:
To enhance compliance, it is important to raise the awareness of the importance of age limits and to connect possible violations of the regulations to negative consequences.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Jordy Gosselt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joris Van Hoof</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Menno De Jong</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2012, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-7-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-7-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/4">
        <title>Substance Abuse Treatment Client Experience in an Employed Population: Results of a Client Survey</title>
        <description>Background:
Understanding client perspectives on treatment is increasingly recognized as key to improving care. Yet information on the perceptions and experiences of workers with private insurance coverage who receive help for substance use conditions is relatively sparse, particularly in managed behavioral health care organization (MBHO) populations. Furthermore, the role of several factors including prior service use has not been fully explored.
Methods:
Employees covered by a large MBHO who had received substance abuse services in the past year were surveyed (146 respondents completed the telephone survey and self-reported service use).
Results:
The most common reasons for entering treatment were problems with health; home, family or friends; or work. Prior treatment users reported more reasons for entering treatment and more substance use-related work impairment. The majority of all respondents felt treatment helped a lot or some. One quarter reported getting less treatment than they felt they needed.Discussion and conclusionsStudy findings point to the need to tailor treatment for prior service users and to recognize the role of work in treatment entry and outcomes. Perceived access issues may be present even among insured clients already in treatment.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Elizabeth Merrick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sharon Reif</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Deirdre Hiatt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dominic Hodgkin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Constance Horgan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Grant Ritter</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2012, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-7-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-7-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/3">
        <title>Alcohol use in the first three years of bereavement: a national representative survey</title>
        <description>Background:
Earlier results concerning alcohol consumption of bereaved persons are contradictory. The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship between bereavement and alcohol consumption accounting for time and gender differences on a nationally representative sample from Hungary (&quot;Hungarostudy Epidemiological Panel Survey&quot;, N = 4457)
Methods:
Drinking characteristics of mourning persons (alcohol consumption, dependence symptoms, and harmful consequences of alcohol use) in the first three years of grief were examined among persons between 18-75 years using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT).
Results:
Men bereaved for one year scored higher on two dimensions of AUDIT (dependence symptoms and harmful alcohol use), while men bereaved for two years scored higher on all three dimensions of AUDIT compared to the non-bereaved. The rate of men clinically at-risk concerning alcohol consumption among the non-bereaved is 12.9%, and among men bereaved for one year is 18.4% (a non-significant difference), while 29.8% (p&lt;0.001, OR=2,781) among men bereaved for two years. However, men bereaved for three years did not differ from the non-bereaved in their drinking habits. In case of bereaved women, again no difference was found with respect to alcohol use compared to the non-bereaved.
Conclusion:
Among bereaved men, the risk of alcohol related problems tends to be higher, which can be shown both among men bereaved for one year as well as men bereaved for two years. Considering the higher morbidity and mortality rates of bereaved men, alcohol consumption might play a mediator role. These facts draw attention to the importance of prevention, early recognition, and effective therapy of hazardous drinking in bereaved men.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Janos Pilling</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Barna Konkoly Thege</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zsolt Demetrovics</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Kopp</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2012, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-7-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-7-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/2">
        <title>The social production of substance abuse and HIV/HCV risk:  an exploratory study of opioid-using immigrants from the former Soviet Union living in New York City</title>
        <description>Background:
Several former Soviet countries have witnessed the rapid emergence of major epidemics of injection drug use (IDU) and associated HIV/HCV, suggesting that immigrants from the former Soviet Union (FSU) may be at heightened risk for similar problems. This exploratory study examines substance use patterns among the understudied population of opioid-using FSU immigrants in the U.S., as well as social contextual factors that may increase these immigrants&apos; susceptibility to opioid abuse and HIV/HCV infection.
Methods:
In-depth interviews were conducted with 10 FSU immigrants living in New York City who initiated opioid use in adolescence or young adulthood, and with 6 drug treatment providers working with this population. Informed by a grounded theory approach, interview transcripts were inductively coded and analyzed to identify key themes.
Results:
The &quot;trauma&quot; of the immigration/acculturation experience was emphasized by participants as playing a critical role in motivating opioid use. Interview data suggest that substance use patterns formed in the high-risk environment of the FSU may persist as behavioral norms within New York City FSU immigrant communities - including a predilection for heroin use among youth, a high prevalence of injection, and a tolerance for syringe sharing within substance-using peer networks. Multiple levels of social context may reproduce FSU immigrants&apos; vulnerability to substance abuse and disease such as:  peer-based interactional contexts in which participants typically used opioids; community workplace settings in which some participants were introduced to and obtained opioids; and cultural norms, with roots in Soviet-era social policies, stigmatizing substance abuse which may contribute to immigrants&apos; reluctance to seek disease prevention and drug treatment services.
Conclusion:
Several behavioral and contextual factors appear to increase FSU immigrants&apos; risk for opioid abuse, IDU and infectious disease. Further research on opioid-using FSU immigrants is warranted and may help prevent increases in HIV/HCV prevalence from occurring within these communities.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Honoria Guarino</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Moore</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lisa Marsch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sal Florio</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-7-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-7-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/1">
        <title>Double jeopardy--drug and sex risks among Russian women who inject drugs:
Initial feasibility and efficacy results of a small randomized controlled trial
</title>
        <description>Background:
With HIV prevalence estimated at 20% among female injecting drug users (IDUs) in St. Petersburg, Russia, there is a critical need to address the HIV risks of this at-risk population. This study characterized HIV risks associated with injecting drug use and sex behaviors and assessed the initial feasibility and efficacy of an adapted Woman-Focused intervention, the Women&apos;s CoOp, relative to a Nutrition control to reduce HIV risk behaviors among female IDUs in an inpatient detoxification drug treatment setting. Method: Women (N = 100) were randomized into one of two one-hour long intervention conditions--the Woman-Focused intervention (n = 51) or a time and attention-matched Nutrition control condition (n = 49). Results: The results showed that 57% of the participants had been told that they were HIV-positive. At 3-month follow-up, both groups showed reduced levels of injecting frequency. However, participants in the Woman-Focused intervention reported, on average, a lower frequency of partner impairment at last sex act and a lower average number of unprotected vaginal sex acts with their main sex partner than the Nutrition condition. Conclusions: The findings suggest that improvements in sexual risk reduction are possible for these at-risk women and that more comprehensive treatment is needed to address HIV and drug risks in this vulnerable population.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Wechsberg Wechsberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Evgeny Krupitsky</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tatiana Romanova</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edwin Zvartau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tracy Kline</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Felicia Browne</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rachel Middlesteadt Ellerson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Georgyi Bobashev</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Zule</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hendree Jones</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2012, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-7-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-7-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/34">
        <title>Difficulty accessing crack pipes and crack pipe sharing among people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada </title>
        <description>Background:
Crack pipe sharing can increase health risks among people who use drugs, yet the reasons for sharing these pipes have not been well described. Therefore, we sought to identify the prevalence and correlates of crack pipe sharing among a community-recruited sample of people who use illicit drugs in Vancouver, a setting where crack pipes are provided at low or no cost.FindingsData for this study were derived from two prospective cohorts of people who use drugs: the Vancouver Injection Drug Users Study (VIDUS) and the AIDS Care Cohort to evaluate Exposure to Survival Services (ACCESS). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with crack pipe sharing. Among 503 crack users, 238 (47.3%) participants reported having shared a crack pipe in the previous six months. Having acquired a mouthpiece in the last six months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31 - 2.79) and difficulty finding new pipes (AOR = 2.19; 95%CI: 1.42 - 3.37) were positively associated with pipe sharing. Binge drug use (AOR = 1.39; 95%CI: 0.96 - 2.02) was marginally associated with sharing pipes.DiscussionThere was a high prevalence of crack pipe sharing in a setting where crack pipes are distributed at low or no cost. Difficulty accessing crack pipes was independently and positively associated with this behavior. These findings suggest that additional efforts are needed to discourage crack pipe sharing as well as increase access to crack pipes.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/34</link>
                <dc:creator>Lianping Ti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Buxton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Evan Wood</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ruth Zhang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julio Montaner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Kerr</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2011, null:34</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-6-34</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-6-34-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/33">
        <title>Prevalence, distribution and predictors of tobacco smoking and chewing in Nepal: a secondary data analysis of Nepal Demographic and Health Survey-2006</title>
        <description>Background:
Nearly four-fifths of estimated 1.1 million smokers live in low or middle-income countries. We aimed to provide national estimates for Nepal on tobacco use prevalence, its distribution across demographic, socio-economic and spatial variables and correlates of tobacco use.
Methods:
A secondary data analysis of 2006 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) was done. A representative sample of 9,036 households was selected by two-stage stratified, probability proportional to size (PPS) technique. We constructed three outcome variables &apos;tobacco smoke&apos;, &apos;tobacco chewer&apos; and &apos;any tobacco use&apos; based on four questions about tobacco use that were asked in DHS questionnaires. Socio-economic, demographic and spatial predictor variables were used. We computed overall prevalence for &apos;tobacco smoking&apos;, &apos;tobacco chewing&apos; and &apos;any tobacco use&apos; i.e. point estimates of prevalence rates, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after adjustment for strata and clustering at primary sampling unit (PSU) level. For correlates of tobacco use, we used multivariate analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and their 95% CIs. A p-value &lt; 0.05 was considered as significant.
Results:
Total number of households, eligible women and men interviewed was 8707, 10793 and 4397 respectively. The overall prevalence for &apos;any tobacco use&apos;, &apos;tobacco smoking&apos; and &apos;tobacco chewing&apos; were 30.3% (95% CI 28.9, 31.7), 20.7% (95% CI 19.5, 22.0) and 14.6% (95% CI 13.5, 15.7) respectively. Prevalence among men was significantly higher than women for &apos;any tobacco use&apos; (56.5% versus 19.6%), &apos;tobacco smoking&apos; (32.8% versus 15.8%) and &apos;tobacco chewing&apos; (38.0% versus 5.0%). By multivariate analysis, older adults, men, lesser educated and those with lower wealth quintiles were more likely to be using all forms of tobacco. Divorced, separated, and widowed were more likely to smoke (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.14, 1.94) and chew tobacco (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.97, 1.93) as compared to those who were currently married. Prevalence of &apos;tobacco chewing&apos; was higher in eastern region (19.7%) and terai/plains (16.2%). &apos;Tobacco smoking&apos; and &apos;any tobacco use&apos; were higher in rural areas, mid-western and far western and mountainous areas.
Conclusions:
Prevalence of tobacco use is considerably high among Nepalese people. Demographic and socioeconomic determinants and spatial distribution should be considered while planning tobacco control interventions.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/33</link>
                <dc:creator>Chandrashekhar Sreeramareddy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>N Ramakrishnareddy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>H N Harsha Kumar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brijesh Sathian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Arokiasamy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2011, null:33</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-6-33</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-6-33-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/32">
        <title>Arabic validation of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS)

</title>
        <description>Background:
The popularity of using the Internet and related applications has grown in Arabic countries in recent years. Despite numerous advantages in terms of optimizing communications among individuals and social systems, the use of the Internet may in certain cases become problematic and engender negative consequences in daily life. As no instrument in the Arabic language is available, however, to measure excessive Internet use, the goal of the current study was to validate an Arabic version of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS).
Methods:
The Arabic version of the CIUS was administered to a sample of 185 Internet users and exploratory and confirmatory analyses performed.
Results:
As found previously for the original version, a one-factor model of the CIUS had good psychometric properties and fit the data well. The total score on the CIUS was positively associated with time spent online.
Conclusion:
The Arabic version of the CIUS seems to be a valid self-report to measure problematic Internet use.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/32</link>
                <dc:creator>Yasser Khazaal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne Chatton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Khodor Atwi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniele Zullino</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Riaz Khan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joel Billieux</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2011, null:32</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-6-32</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-6-32-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/31">
        <title>Access to housing subsidies, housing status, drug use and HIV risk among low-income U.S. urban residents</title>
        <description>Background:
Much research has shown an association between homelessness and unstable housing and HIV risk but most has relied on relatively narrow definitions of housing status that preclude a deeper understanding of this relationship. Fewer studies have examined access to housing subsidies and supportive housing programs among low-income populations with different personal characteristics.  This paper explores personal characteristics associated with access to housing subsidies and supportive housing, the relationship between personal characteristics and housing status, and the relationship between housing status and sexual risk behaviors among low-income urban residents.
Methods:
Surveys were conducted with 392 low-income residents from Hartford and East Harford, Connecticut through a targeted sampling plan.  We measured personal characteristics (income, education, use of crack, heroin, or cocaine in the last 6 months, receipt of welfare benefits, mental illness diagnosis, arrest, criminal conviction, longest prison term served, and self-reported HIV diagnosis); access to housing subsidies or supportive housing programs; current housing status; and sexual risk behaviors.  To answer the aims above, we performed univariate analyses using Chi-square or 2-sided ANOVA&apos;s.  Those with significance levels above (0.10) were included in multivariate analyses.  We performed 2 separate multiple regressions to determine the effects of personal characteristics on access to housing subsidies and access to supportive housing respectively.  We used multinomial main effects logistic regression to determine the effects of housing status on sexual risk behavior.
Results:
Being HIV positive or having a mental illness predicted access to housing subsidies and supportive housing, while having a criminal conviction was not related to access to either housing subsidies or supportive housing. Drug use was associated with poorer housing statuses such as living on the street or in a shelter, or temporarily doubling up with friends, acquaintances or sex partners. Living with friends, acquaintances or sex partners was associated with greater sexual risk than those living on the street or in other stable housing situations.
Conclusions:
Results suggest that providing low-income and supportive housing may be an effective structural HIV prevention intervention, but that the availability and accessibility of these programs must be increased.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/31</link>
                <dc:creator>Julia Dickson-Gomez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Timothy McAuliffe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Convey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Margaret Weeks</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jill Owczarak</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2011, null:31</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-6-31</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-6-31-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>31</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/30">
        <title>Successful and unsuccessful cannabis quitters: 
Comparing group characteristics and quitting strategies
</title>
        <description>Background:
In order to improve treatments for cannabis use disorder, a better understanding of factors associated with successful quitting is required.MethodThis study examined differences between successful (n = 87) and unsuccessful (n = 78) cannabis quitters. Participants completed a questionnaire addressing demographic, mental health, and cannabis-related variables, as well as quitting strategies during their most recent quit attempt.
Results:
Eighteen strategies derived from cognitive behavioral therapy were entered into a principal components analysis. The analysis yielded four components, representing (1) Stimulus Removal, (2) Motivation Enhancement, (3) (lack of) Distraction, and (4) (lack of) Coping. Between groups comparisons showed that unsuccessful quitters scored significantly higher on Motivation Enhancement and (lack of) Coping. This may indicate that unsuccessful quitters focus on the desire to quit, but do not sufficiently plan strategies for coping. Unsuccessful quitters also had significantly more symptoms of depression and stress; less education; lower exposure to formal treatment; higher day-to-day exposure to other cannabis users; and higher cannabis dependence scores.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest that coping, environmental modification, and co-morbid mental health problems may be important factors to emphasize in treatments for cannabis use disorder.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/30</link>
                <dc:creator>Sally Rooke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Melissa Norberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Copeland</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2011, null:30</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-6-30</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-6-30-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>30</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

