<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</description>
        <dc:date>2012-05-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/3/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/1/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/5/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/3/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/18" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/7">
        <title>Relief oriented use of marijuana by teens</title>
        <description>Background:
There are indications that marijuana is increasingly used to alleviate symptoms and for the treatment of a variety of medical conditions both physical and psychological. The purpose of this study was to describe the health concerns and problems that prompt some adolescents to use marijuana for therapeutic reasons, and their beliefs about the risks and benefits of the therapeutic use of marijuana.
Methods:
As part of a larger ethnographic study of 63 adolescents who were regular marijuana users, we analyzed interviews conducted with 20 youth who self-identified as using marijuana to relieve or manage health problems.
Results:
Thematic analysis revealed that these teens differentiated themselves from recreational users and positioned their use of marijuana for relief by emphasizing their inability to find other ways to deal with their health problems, the sophisticated ways in which they titrated their intake, and the benefits that they experienced. These teens used marijuana to gain relief from difficult feelings (including depression, anxiety and stress), sleep difficulties, problems with concentration and physical pain. Most were not overly concerned about the risks associated with using marijuana, maintaining that their use of marijuana was not &apos;in excess&apos; and that their use fit into the realm of &apos;normal.&apos;
Conclusion:
Marijuana is perceived by some teens to be the only available alternative for teens experiencing difficult health problems when medical treatments have failed or when they lack access to appropriate health care.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Joan Bottorff</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joy Johnson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Barbara Moffat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tasmin Mulvogue</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2009, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-4-7</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Teens use cannabis for self-medication </dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Nearly a third of teens who regularly smoke cannabis use it as a therapeutic alternative to legal medication when these treatments have failed or when they lack access to appropriate health care.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-4-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/3/1/8">
        <title>The NARCONON drug education curriculum for high school students: a non-randomized, controlled prevention trial</title>
        <description>Background:
An estimated 13 million youths aged 12 to 17 become involved with alcohol, tobacco and other drugs annually. The number of 12- to 17-year olds abusing controlled prescription drugs increased an alarming 212 percent between 1992 and 2003. For many youths, substance abuse precedes academic and health problems including lower grades, higher truancy, drop out decisions, delayed or damaged physical, cognitive, and emotional development, or a variety of other costly consequences. For thirty years the Narconon program has worked with schools and community groups providing single educational modules aimed at supplementing existing classroom-based prevention activities. In 2004, Narconon International developed a multi-module, universal prevention curriculum for high school ages based on drug abuse etiology, program quality management data, prevention theory and best practices. We review the curriculum and its rationale and test its ability to change drug use behavior, perceptions of risk/benefits, and general knowledge.
Methods:
After informed parental consent, approximately 1000 Oklahoma and Hawai&apos;i high school students completed a modified Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) Participant Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs survey at three testing points: baseline, one month later, and six month follow-up. Schools assigned to experimental conditions scheduled the Narconon curriculum between the baseline and one-month follow-up test; schools in control conditions received drug education after the six-month follow-up. Student responses were analyzed controlling for baseline differences using analysis of covariance.
Results:
At six month follow-up, youths who received the Narconon drug education curriculum showed reduced drug use compared with controls across all drug categories tested. The strongest effects were seen in all tobacco products and cigarette frequency followed by marijuana. There were also significant reductions measured for alcohol and amphetamines. The program also produced changes in knowledge, attitudes and perception of risk.
Conclusion:
The eight-module Narconon curriculum has thorough grounding in substance abuse etiology and prevention theory. Incorporating several historically successful prevention strategies this curriculum reduced drug use among youths.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/3/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Richard Lennox</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marie Cecchini</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2008, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-03-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-3-8</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-3-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-03-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/16">
        <title>The readiness of addiction treatment agencies for
health care reform</title>
        <description>The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) aims to provide affordable health insurance and expanded health care coverage for some 32 million Americans.  The PPACA makes provisions for modernizing the delivery of health care services using technology, evidence-based treatments, and integrated and patient-centered care to ensure effectiveness, efficiency and cost-savings within the health care system.To gauge the addiction treatment field&apos;s readiness for health reform, the authors developed a Health Reform Readiness Index (HRRI) survey for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment agencies. Addiction treatment administrators and providers from around the United States were invited to complete the survey. Respondents self-assessed their agency based on thirteen conditions pertinent to health reform readiness, and received a confidential score and instant feedback.Overall, agencies (n=276) indicated, on a scale of &quot;Needs to Begin,&quot;  &quot;Early Stages,&quot; &quot;On the Way,&quot; and &quot;Advanced&quot;,  that they were in the Early Stages of health reform preparation for eleven of thirteen conditions. Of greater concern was organizations that had budgets of &lt; $5 million (n = 193) were less likely than those with &gt; $5 million budgets to have information technology, evidence based practices, quality management systems, a continuum of care, good financial health, or a board of directors informed about PPACA.Based on the findings of the HRRI, it is clear that the SUD field, and in particular smaller organizations, have much to do to prepare for a future environment that has greater health information technology, credentialed workforce, quality of care, and continuum of care expectations.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Todd Molfenter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Victor Capoccia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mike Boyle</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Sherbeck</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2012, null:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-7-16</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-7-16-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/1/1/14">
        <title>Absinthism: a fictitious 19th century syndrome with present impact</title>
        <description>Absinthe, a bitter spirit containing wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.), was banned at the beginning of the 20th century as consequence of its supposed unique adverse effects. After nearly century-long prohibition, absinthe has seen a resurgence after recent de-restriction in many European countries. This review provides information on the history of absinthe and one of its constituent, thujone. Medical and toxicological aspects experienced and discovered before the prohibition of absinthe are discussed in detail, along with their impact on the current situation. The only consistent conclusion that can be drawn from those 19th century studies about absinthism is that wormwood oil but not absinthe is a potent agent to cause seizures. Neither can it be concluded that the beverage itself was epileptogenic nor that the so-called absinthism can exactly be distinguished as a distinct syndrome from chronic alcoholism.The theory of a previous gross overestimation of the thujone content of absinthe may have been verified by a number of independent studies. Based on the current available evidence, thujone concentrations of both pre-ban and modern absinthes may not have been able to cause detrimental health effects other than those encountered in common alcoholism. Today, a questionable tendency of absinthe manufacturers can be ascertained that use the ancient theories of absinthism as a targeted marketing strategy to bring absinthe into the spheres of a legal drug-of-abuse. Misleading advertisements of aphrodisiac or psychotropic effects of absinthe try to re-establish absinthe&apos;s former reputation. In distinction from commercially manufactured absinthes with limited thujone content, a health risk to consumers is the uncontrolled trade of potentially unsafe herbal products such as absinthe essences that are readily available over the internet.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/1/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Stephan Padosch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dirk Lachenmeier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lars Kroener</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2006, null:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-05-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-1-14</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-1-14-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-05-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/5/1/18">
        <title>Alcohol policy enforcement and changes in student drinking rates in a statewide public college system: a follow-up study</title>
        <description>Background:
Heavy alcohol use among U.S. college students is a major contributor to young adult morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to examine whether college alcohol policy enforcement levels predict changes in student drinking and related behaviors in a state system of public colleges and universities, following a system-wide change to a stricter policy.
Methods:
Students and administrators at 11 Massachusetts public colleges/universities completed surveys in 1999 (N of students = 1252), one year after the policy change, and again in 2001 (N = 1074). We calculated policy enforcement scores for each school based on the reports of deans of students, campus security chiefs, and students, and examined the correlations between perceived enforcement levels and the change in student drinking rates over the subsequent two year period, after weighting the 2001 data to adjust for demographic changes in the student body.
Results:
Overall rates of any past-30-days drinking, heavy episodic drinking, and usual heavy drinking among past-30-days drinkers were all lower in 2001 compared to 1999. School-level analyses (N = 11) found deans&apos; baseline reports of stricter enforcement were strongly correlated with subsequent declines in heavy episodic drinking (Pearson&apos;s r = -0.73, p = 0.011). Moreover, consistently high enforcement levels across time, as reported by deans, were associated with greater declines in heavy episodic drinking. Such relationships were not found for students&apos; and security chiefs&apos; reports of enforcement. Marijuana use did not rise during this period of decline in heavy drinking.
Conclusions:
Study findings suggest that stronger enforcement of a stricter alcohol policy may be associated with reductions in student heavy drinking rates over time. An aggressive enforcement stance by deans may be an important element of an effective college alcohol policy.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/5/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Sion Harris</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lon Sherritt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shari Van Hook</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Henry Wechsler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Knight</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2010, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-5-18</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-5-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/17">
        <title>Relapse Prevention for Addictive Behaviors</title>
        <description>The Relapse Prevention (RP) model has been a mainstay of addictions theory and treatment since its introduction three decades ago. This paper provides an overview and update of RP for addictive behaviors with a focus on developments over the last decade (2000-2010). Major treatment outcome studies and meta-analyses are summarized, as are selected empirical findings relevant to the tenets of the RP model. Notable advances in RP in the last decade include the introduction of a reformulated cognitive-behavioral model of relapse, the application of advanced statistical methods to model relapse in large randomized trials, and the development of mindfulness-based relapse prevention. We also review the emergent literature on genetic correlates of relapse following pharmacological and behavioral treatments. The continued influence of RP is evidenced by its integration in most cognitive-behavioral substance use interventions. However, the tendency to subsume RP within other treatment modalities has posed a barrier to systematic evaluation of the RP model. Overall, RP remains an influential cognitive-behavioral framework that can inform both theoretical and clinical approaches to understanding and facilitating behavior change.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Christian Hendershot</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katie Witkiewitz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William George</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>G. Alan Marlatt</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2011, null:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-07-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-6-17</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-6-17-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-07-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/16">
        <title>College students and use of K2: an emerging drug of abuse in young persons</title>
        <description>Background:
K2 or &quot;spice&quot; has emerged as a popular legal alternative to marijuana among adolescents and young adults. However, no data has been published assessing prevalence of and associations with ever K2 use in any population. This study&apos;s aims were to examine prevalence of ever K2 use among a sample of college students, to determine characteristics of persons who use K2, and to access the association between K2 and other drug use.FindingsEver use of K2 was reported by 69 (8%) of the sample of 852 college students. Response rate was 36%. Bivariate and multivariate analyses assessed whether sociodemographic characteristics and other drug use were associated with ever use of K2. Ever use of K2 was reported by 69 (8%) of the sample. Among these 69 individuals, 61 (88%) had used a cigarette and 25 (36%) had used a hookah to smoke K2. In multivariate analyses, K2 use was more common in males (vs. females, adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 2.0, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.2-3.5, p = 0.01) and 1st or 2nd year college students (vs. 3rd year or above, aOR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.2-5.0, p = 0.02).
Conclusions:
Ever use of K2 in this sample was higher than ever use of many other drugs of abuse that are commonly monitored in adolescents and young adults. Although DEA had banned five synthetic cannabinoids recently, clinicians and public health officials concerned with substance abuse in youth should be aware of and monitor the use of this drug in college students over time.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Xingdi Hu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brian Primack</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tracey Barnett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Cook</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2011, null:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-07-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-6-16</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-6-16-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-07-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/3/1/3">
        <title>Risk factors for alcohol and other drug use by healthcare professionals </title>
        <description>Background:
Given the increasingly stressful environment due to manpower shortages in the healthcare system in general, substance induced impairment among some healthcare professions is anticipated to grow. Though recent studies suggest that the prevalence of substance abuse is no higher in healthcare professionals (HPs) than the general population, given the responsibility to the public, any impairment could place the public at increased risk for errors. Few studies have ever reported predictors or risk factors for alcohol and other drug use (AOD) across a sample of HPs.
Methods:
The study used a cross-sectional, descriptive self-report survey in a small northeastern state. A 7-page survey was mailed to a stratified random sample of 697 dentists, nurses, pharmacists and physicians registered in a northeastern state. The main outcome measures were demographic characteristics, lifetime, past year and past month prevalence of AOD use, the frequency of use, drug related dysfunctions, drug misuse and abuse potential. Six contacts during the summer of 2002 resulted in a 68.7% response rate (479/697).
Results:
Risk factors contributing to any reported past year AOD use, as well as significant (defined as the amount of AOD use by the top 25% of respondents) past year AOD use by HPs were examined using logistic regression. Risk factors of any self-reported past year AOD use included moderate or more frequency of alcohol use, being in situations when offered AODs, feeling immune to the addictive effects of drugs (pharmaceutical invincibility) and socializing with substance abusers. Risk factors of significant past year AOD use were HPs with younger licensees, a moderate pattern of alcohol use and not socializing with substance abusers.
Conclusion:
National and state organizations need to develop policies that focus on prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation of alcohol and other drug-using healthcare professionals. The results of this study may help to delineate the characteristics of HPs abusing drugs, leading to the development of more effective policies designed to protect the public, and move toward more tailored and effective intervention strategies for HPs.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/3/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>George Kenna</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Lewis</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2008, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-01-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-3-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-3-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-01-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/18">
        <title>Effects of expertise on football betting</title>
        <description>Background:
Football (soccer) is one of the most popular sports in the world, including Europe. It is associated with important betting activities. A common belief, widely spread among those who participate in gambling activities, is that knowledge and expertise on football lead to better prediction skills for match outcomes. If unfounded, however, this belief should be considered as a form of &quot;illusion of control.&quot; The aim of this study was to examine whether football experts are better than nonexperts at predicting football match scores.
Methods:
Two hundred and fifty-eight persons took part in the study: 21.3% as football experts, 54.3% as laypersons (non-initiated to football), and 24.4% as football amateurs. They predicted the scores of the first 10 matches of the 2008 UEFA European Football Championship. Logistic regressions were carried out to assess the link between the accuracy of the forecasted scores and the expertise of the participants (expert, amateur, layperson), controlling for age and gender.
Results:
The variables assessed did not predict the accuracy of scoring prognosis (R2 ranged from 1% to 6%).
Conclusions:
Expertise, age, and gender did not appear to have an impact on the accuracy of the football match prognoses. Therefore, the belief that football expertise improves betting skills is no more than a cognitive distortion called the &quot;illusion of control.&quot; Gamblers may benefit from psychological interventions that target the illusion of control related to their believed links between betting skills and football expertise. Public health policies may need to consider the phenomenon in order to prevent problem gambling related to football betting.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/7/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Yasser Khazaal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne Chatton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joël Billieux</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lucio Bizzini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Grégoire Monney</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Emmanuelle Fresard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gabriel Thorens</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Guido Bondolfi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nady El-Guebaly</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniele Zullino</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Riaz Khan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2012, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-7-18</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-7-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/18">
        <title>Drug use and nightlife: More than just dance music </title>
        <description>Background:
Research over the last decade has focused almost exclusively on the association between electronic music and MDMA (3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine or &quot;ecstasy&quot;) or other stimulant drug use in clubs. Less attention has been given to other nightlife venues and music preferences, such as rock music or southern/funky music. This study aims to examine a broader spectrum of nightlife, beyond dance music. It looks at whether certain factors influence the frequency of illegal drug and alcohol use: the frequency of going to certain nightlife venues in the previous month (such as, pubs, clubs or goa parties); listening to rock music, dance music or southern and funky music; or sampling venues (such as, clubs, dance events or rock festivals). The question of how these nightlife variables influence the use of popular drugs like alcohol, MDMA, cannabis, cocaine and amphetamines is addressed.
Methods:
The study sample consisted of 775 visitors of dance events, clubs and rock festivals in Belgium. Study participants answered a survey on patterns of going out, music preferences and drug use. Odds ratios were used to determine whether the odds of being an illegal substance user are higher for certain nightlife-related variables. Furthermore, five separate ordinal regression analyses were used to investigate drug use in relation to music preference, venues visited during the last month and sampling venue.
Results:
Respondents who used illegal drugs were 2.5 times more likely to report that they prefer dance music. Goa party visitors were nearly 5 times more likely to use illegal drugs. For those who reported visiting clubs, the odds of using illegal drugs were nearly 2 times higher. Having gone to a pub in the last month was associated with both more frequent alcohol use and more frequent illegal substance use. People who reported liking rock music and attendees of rock festivals used drugs less frequently.
Conclusions:
It was concluded that a more extended recreational environment, beyond dance clubs, is associated with frequent drug use. This stresses the importance of targeted prevention in various recreational venues tailored to the specific needs of the setting and its visitors.</description>
        <link>http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Tina Van Havere</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wouter Vanderplasschen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Lammertyn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eric Broekaert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Bellis</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2011, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-07-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-597X-6-18</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1747-597X-6-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1747-597X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-07-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

